TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics228% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 21:09
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 97.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 263
93% 165 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 808
82% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,070
66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 97.2%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Gigabyte(1458 4080) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Lighting 343
Reflection 308
Parallax 389
280% 347 fps
MRender 375
Gravity 274
Splatting 198
221% 282 fps
Poor: 162% ↑
This bench: 228%
 Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 308 308 305 307 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 462
Mixed 402
SusWrite 318
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 45.6
173% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 323
253% 350 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 129%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$95
838GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 471 471 472 471 472 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
397GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 958 1301 768 611 608 610 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1771
Write 1,771
Mixed 702
SusWrite 809
282% 1,263 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 59.4
216% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 1,058
DQ Write 830
DQ Mixed 846
660% 911 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑
This bench: 229%
 Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB-$253
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 28.6
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 47
SC Mixed 32.3
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 47
85% 47 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 115%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $179Bench 88%, 746,287 samples2,922x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples217x
Core i7-8086KIntel  $443Bench 91%, 38,086 samples187x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples769x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples362x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples295x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples212x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples160x
RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples189x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples173x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples130x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback