TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 10:22
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 98
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 873
83% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 96%
 Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 319 320 319 319 319 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 320
Mixed 314
SusWrite 319
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 40.7
165% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 252
215% 316 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 129%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$95
440GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 483 487 484 482 485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 457
Mixed 468
SusWrite 479
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 68.9
228% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 137%
 Great: 137%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
173GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1389 861 654 654 654 654 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,638
Write 1,566
Mixed 643
SusWrite 811
260% 1,165 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 65.2
239% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,119
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 816
657% 931 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑
This bench: 232%
 Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB-$253
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 28.6
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 32.2
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 46.1
87% 46.1 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 115%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $179Bench 88%, 746,287 samples2,922x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples217x
Core i7-8086KIntel  $443Bench 91%, 38,086 samples187x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples769x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples362x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples295x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples212x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples160x
RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples189x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples173x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples130x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback