DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 13:08
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 134
62% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 334
36% 286 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (43 fps cap detected)
33.1% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 41.5
Parallax 43.3
35% 42.7 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 27.8
29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 254 249 260 259 259 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Hitachi HDS72202 2TB
980GB free
Firmware: A20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 108 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 115
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 106
67% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDN726060AL 6TB
501GB free
Firmware: T517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 128 126 127 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 127
Write 133
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 126
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 119%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2014)-$220
3TB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 179 182 183 183 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 93.2
Write 107
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 180
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 118%
Hitachi HDN721010AL 10TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83XN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 170 167 167 173 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 166
Mixed 96.1
SusWrite 168
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
290% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x1GB
6 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 15.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback