Asrock X370 Killer SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Killer SLI  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170606
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '17 at 00:08
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 73
1-Core 114
2-Core 201
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 582
54% 452 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 119
Parallax 114
97% 118 fps
MRender 99.4
Gravity 106
Splatting 106
85% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 457
Write 407
Mixed 440
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 21.9
117% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 22.4
42% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 113%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 180
Mixed 173
135% 179 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.19
102% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 64
Write 69.6
Mixed 77.6
93% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.18
68% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.D1GMM.AZB0B 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Killer SLI Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Killer SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $624
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback