Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '22 at 10:39
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 214
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 634
65% 525 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 68
Parallax 94.5
53% 75.9 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 76.8
Splatting 53.3
52% 65.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 222 209 223 205 208 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 460
Mixed 362
SusWrite 232
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 48.9
163% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 360
273% 368 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZSW F4-3600C18-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZSW F4-3600C18-8GTZRX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 39
118% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 32.4
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback