Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 23:43
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 117
55% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 227
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 39
33% 39.5 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 27.9
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 138 124 129 127 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 443
Write 352
Mixed 310
SusWrite 143
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 15.6
72% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 35.8
43% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
HPT DISK 0_0 600GB
274GB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 109 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.2% Good
Read 103
Write 111
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 107
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 78%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
68GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 88 87 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 87.4
Write 94.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 87.3
113% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 103 103 104 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 74
SusWrite 102
133% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
189% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1600C8 CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 CM3X2G1600C8 CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 13.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.7
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback