Lenovo 11CVS2HJ00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 11CVS2HJ00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3164
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 22:06
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 819
79% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3164) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 8.4
5% 8.17 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.4
8% 9.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1081) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 10.9
7% 9.67 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 7.1
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GDE9X081N 512GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41720C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1494 841 870 826 828 825 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,053
Write 2189
Mixed 1,618
SusWrite 947
382% 1,702 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 78.1
256% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,033
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 860
646% 869 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 259%
Great: 328%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
461GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 446 442 438 429 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 461
Mixed 418
SusWrite 441
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 51.9
169% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 336
253% 339 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
45GB free
Firmware: 506ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 134 135 124 132 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 384
Write 212
Mixed 224
SusWrite 135
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 36.8
134% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 133
121% 185 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 83%
Buffalo SSD-PGM/N 960GB
337GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.3% Very poor
Read 37
Write 36.3
Mixed 38
SusWrite 42.6
9% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 11.9
42% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 25.3
DQ Mixed 16.1
14% 21.8 MB/s
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 165 169 168 169 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 121
Write 113
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 168
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 104%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 115 112 112 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 108
Write 100
Mixed 66
SusWrite 113
130% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 48%
Patriot Memory 248GB
174GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 4.3 2.5 6.4 5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 86.8
Write 3.5
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 5
29% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2
98% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 34%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
477GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 98 97 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 82.2
Write 99
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 97
105% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.4
223% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 52%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 11CVS2HJ00 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 11CVS2HJ00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback