Penguin Relion 2751

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPenguin Relion 2751  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8DTU
Memory185.5 GB free of 192.004 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 19:53
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 160
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 650
56% 479 Pts
64-Core 1,284
80% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V7900 Graphics Adapter
Dell(1028 2B0C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 25.8
15% 24.4 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 19.2
17% 21 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3001FYYG-01SL3 3TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: VR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 5.9 6.2 0 57 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 122
Write 116
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 43.4
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 94%
Ibm-a040 ST3000NM0023 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: BC5G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 7.2 7.1 6.7 7.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Ibm-esxs ST3000NM0043 E 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EC5L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 0 0 137 166 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 166
Write 86.7
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 77.1
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 100%
Ibm-xiv ST33000650SS B1 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: BC36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 55%
Ibm-xiv HUS723030ALS64B1 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: JYK5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 7.1 7.2 6.9 7.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 59%
Ibm-xiv HUS723030ALS64B1 3TB
530GB free
Firmware: J3K5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 43 43 43 42 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 125
Write 5.3
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 38.8
42% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 59%
Ibm-xiv HUS723030ALS64B1 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: J3K5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 127
Write 5.7
Mixed 55
SusWrite 37.1
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16... 228GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 19.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Relion 2751 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Penguin Relion 2751

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback