Penguin Relion 2751

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPenguin Relion 2751  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8DTU
Memory186.5 GB free of 192.004 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 19:31
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 153
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 683
58% 497 Pts
64-Core 1,277
79% 1,277 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V7900 Graphics Adapter
Dell(1028 2B0C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 20.2
8% 10 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 17.5
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3001FYYG-01SL3 3TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: VR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.7 1.1 0 87 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 89
Write 113
Mixed 39
SusWrite 41.1
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 94%
Ibm-a040 ST3000NM0023 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: BC5G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.1 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Ibm-esxs ST3000NM0043 E 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EC5L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 0 112 165 161 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 85.6
Write 60.6
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 108
53% 73 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 100%
Ibm-xiv ST33000650SS B1 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: BC36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 7.2 7.2 7 7.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 55%
Ibm-xiv HUS723030ALS64B1 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: JYK5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.1 7.2 7.1 6.9 7.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 59%
Ibm-xiv HUS723030ALS64B1 3TB
530GB free
Firmware: J3K5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 122
Write 5
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 37.8
41% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 59%
Ibm-xiv HUS723030ALS64B1 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: J3K5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 130
Write 5.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 37.5
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16D316R11D4KF SL16... 228GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 19.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Relion 2751 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Penguin Relion 2751

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback