Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	13.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 945 12,746 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 49.6 2-Core 100 50% 77.7 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 191 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 64GB 64GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 13 10 14 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.3% Very poor	Read 101 Write 76 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 12.6 11% 52 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 7.6 24% 7.9 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 16.7 DQ Mixed 7.2 9% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 84%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 53GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 25 24 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 27.6 Write 15.9 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 24.5 30% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2.6 182% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 11.4 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 8 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+AMDBench 41%, 5,594 samples	9x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+AMDBench 35%, 4,133 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 8800 GTSNvidiaBench 4%, 3,160 samples	3x
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	2x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16