Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 19:33
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 64
2-Core 117
52% 84 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 278
31% 242 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 45.1
Parallax 39.8
33% 42 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 35.4
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 279 288 290 290 279 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 440
Mixed 390
SusWrite 296
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 45.9
149% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 254
190% 254 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
74GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 65 66 64 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 92.8
Write 93.2
Mixed 63
SusWrite 65.2
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
92GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 85 85 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 83.8
Write 83.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 85
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
266GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 109 110 108 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 87.9
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 109
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 24GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback