Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive391% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 01:03
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 279
86% 163 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 965
83% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,361
84% 1,361 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
Gigabyte(1458 408E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Lighting 246
Reflection 227
Parallax 220
201% 231 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 170
Splatting 138
148% 189 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 166%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
925GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2070 3172 2017 1751 1743 1733 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
391% Outstanding
Read 2,681
Write 3,108
Mixed 2,792
SusWrite 2081
602% 2,665 MB/s
4K Read 71.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 101
328% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,324
DQ Write 1,115
DQ Mixed 1,237
922% 1,225 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 391%
Great: 508%
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$130
905GB free
Firmware: 611100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2124 2225 2238 2225 2212 2223 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
444% Outstanding
Read 3,440
Write 2,233
Mixed 2439
SusWrite 2,208
577% 2,580 MB/s
4K Read 71.9
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 93.3
328% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,727
DQ Write 1,449
DQ Mixed 1,576
1,184% 1,584 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 444%
Great: 595%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
233GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 46 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 129
Write 49.2
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 49.9
88% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
86% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.6% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 24.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 23.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback