Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120216
Uptime18.8 Days
Run DateMay 03 '22 at 18:45
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 165
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 228
31% 228 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB
CLim: 960 MHz, MLim: 1126 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 1.9
4% 3.67 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
261GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 215 205 208 205 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.3% Above average
Read 218
Write 209
Mixed 208
SusWrite 210
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 31.3
103% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 45.9
38% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 95 97 94 99 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 96.6
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 96.3
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/4G 075D GR1333D364L9/8G 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-DS2 Builds (Compare 2,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 - $69

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback