HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP Laptop 15-da0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A6
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '22 at 06:21
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 68%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 96.2
47% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 94
16% 112 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 84A6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9171
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 6.2
5% 4.93 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 204 215 255 271 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 301
Write 222
Mixed 220
SusWrite 236
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 7.1
40% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 18.1
51% 106 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 93%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
749GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 12 8.1 8.5 9.7 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 13.2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 9
6% 7.68 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2400.C8ET Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 9.7
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-da0xxx Builds (Compare 4,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback