Acer Aspire A515-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Grumpy_PK
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190926
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '20 at 18:01
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 41.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 173
57% 106 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 258
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 134F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.28.01
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.74% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 13
Parallax 8.06
6% 9.24 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 15.2
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.74%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 184 180 184 185 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 326
Write 283
Mixed 264
SusWrite 188
60% 265 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 21.6
86% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 237
186% 257 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 129%
Team T253X1240G 240GB
215GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 241 103 104 103 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 412
Write 343
Mixed 316
SusWrite 165
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 19.7
73% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 157
124% 172 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2400.C8ET Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 19.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 20
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 72%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-43 Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback