Lenovo 20BTS10C00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 22 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20BTS10C00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BTS10C00
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 18:49
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 172
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 254
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2227) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 7.3
4% 5.37 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 6.9
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKJF180A5 SATA 180GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LWDi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 162 144 156 155 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 330
Write 250
Mixed 271
SusWrite 154
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 36.8
133% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 143
138% 219 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674-M0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 19.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20BTS10C00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20BTS10C00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback