Sicomputer Nauta 01C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSicomputer Nauta 01C  (all builds)
MotherboardSi NL40_50CU
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200911
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 14:12
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 212
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 434
48% 379 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 40C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 7.9
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CLR-8W512 512GB
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EQ20901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 265 230 266 316 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,544
Write 304
Mixed 366
SusWrite 291
136% 626 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 21.5
158% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 294
250% 381 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 144%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 23.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 25.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nauta 01C Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Sicomputer Nauta 01C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback