HP Laptop 15-ef1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-ef1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8706
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210922
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 08:46
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 36.1
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 134
40% 75 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 200
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8706) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.44
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 215 140 104 107 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 336
Write 279
Mixed 316
SusWrite 154
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 35.2
124% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 435
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 400
288% 375 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 190%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 10.1
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-ef1xxx Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-ef1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback