Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220303
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 05:46
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 222
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 766
72% 601 Pts
64-Core 914
57% 914 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2030 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.7% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 52.8
Parallax 80.3
46% 63.3 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 63.4
Splatting 45.8
45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2 256GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8TM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 82 24 11 3.2 5.7 MB/s
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.8% Below average
Read 260
Write 176
Mixed 147
SusWrite 41
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 7.6
63% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 196
142% 182 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 79%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
6GB free
Firmware: S3Z4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 370
Mixed 368
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 18.4
85% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 53.3
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 31.3
74% 143 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
17GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 116 124 111 129 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 133
Write 144
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 121
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73%
Great: 107%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 38 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 32.8
Write 31.3
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 36.8
24% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
216% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 90%
WD 3200BEV External 320GB
25GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 31 32 32 32 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 34
Write 30.2
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 30.8
40% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 32.5
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 26.4
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 4,678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0 - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback