Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 06:24
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 67%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 607
58% 482 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 7.22
8% 31.5 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 75.1
41% 47.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 34 67 64 38 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 304
Write 176
Mixed 103
SusWrite 45.9
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 6.1
23% 8.9 MB/s
DQ Read 92
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 111
82% 106 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 79%
Patriot Burst 480GB
417GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 17 18 14 11 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
5.88% Terrible
Read 58.4
Write 17.7
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 14.1
6% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.3
8% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
277GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 13 13 15 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 10.7
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 12.8
8% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 106%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
200GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 25 27 23 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 46.9
Write 48.4
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 22.2
26% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 35.2
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 27.1
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 7,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $875
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback