Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 17:05
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 149
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 274
29% 230 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 0862) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 8.3
6% 6.87 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SH00R512GB 512GB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 13 12 14 17 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 421
Write 415
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 44.6
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 0.6
24% 7.33 MB/s
DQ Read 89.4
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 0.7
59% 136 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
809GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 171 162 159 190 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 175
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 170
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
WD My Book 640GB
289GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 37 36 37 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
20% Poor
Read 34.9
Write 37.3
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 37.2
47% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1438 TIMETEC-UD3-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 16.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback