Asus P5K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5K  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081014
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 15:06
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 89.5
43% 67.6 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 173
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 61.8
52% 64.7 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 54.9
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC064MAG 64GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 48 40 39 39 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.2% Poor
Read 193
Write 64
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 41.2
22% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 6.8
45% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 53%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
37GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 160 187 190 195 200 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.3% Above average
Read 227
Write 219
Mixed 218
SusWrite 180
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 33.3
108% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 46.2
37% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 125%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
96GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 72 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41% Average
Read 69.3
Write 60.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 72.9
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
70GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 70
Mixed 48
SusWrite 73.9
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 6
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $399

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $619
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback