TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Alldocube i1405S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlldocube i1405S  (all builds)
MotherboardALLDOCUBE ALLDOCUBE
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 11:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 53
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 150
52% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 267
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 51.8%
 Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 5.5
4% 5.77 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 3.9
4% 5.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 4.2%
 Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD-HYX-1HAH19-256-SN312 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEA2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 296 314 277 310 312 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 352
Write 182
Mixed 198
SusWrite 296
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 11.9
44% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 65
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 168
119% 146 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 51.5%
 Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 51.7%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical i1405S Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Alldocube i1405S

CPU
Celeron N5100IntelBench 34%, 996 samples10x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples10x
SSD
SSD-HYX-1HAH19-256-SN312 256GBBench 38%, 6 samples9x
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples1x
RAM
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GBMicronBench 48%, 69 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback