HP dx2480 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP dx2480 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardBoard 0B08h
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090514
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 09:57
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7200-$14
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Memory 37.7
1-Core 38
2-Core 52.5
27% 42.7 Pts
4-Core 61.3
8-Core 65.6
8% 63.4 Pts
64-Core 57.3
4% 57.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 16
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 14.3
13% 16.7 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 16.9
14% 16.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ABS120G 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 51 50 33 44 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 188
Write 118
Mixed 178
SusWrite 43.8
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 13.1
54% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.3
DQ Write 79
DQ Mixed 22.2
26% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 29%
Great: 64%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$20
58GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 53 72 71 62 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 71.5
Mixed 58
SusWrite 59.3
48% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
15% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical dx2480 MT Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP dx2480 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $14
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback