Gigabyte GA-A55M-S2HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A55M-S2HP  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 21:57
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3670 APU
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 86.2
38% 61.1 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 168
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 2.9
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 295 294 292 293 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 231
Write 297
Mixed 233
SusWrite 286
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 21.9
71% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 66.2
DQ Mixed 41.3
34% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.3% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A55M-S2HP Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A55M-S2HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback