Dell OptiPlex 7050

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7050
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7050  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 11:09
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6402P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 383
51% 380 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 3.3
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 109 110 75 81 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 291
Write 321
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 88.9
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
9% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
38GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 169 160 162 183 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 128
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 162
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 100%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905713-030.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7050 Builds (Compare 5,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7050

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback