Toshiba Satellite C855D

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C855D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130109
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '22 at 09:17
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Memory 23.6 1-Core 9.8 2-Core 15.3 12% 16.2 Pts	4-Core 19.6 8-Core 23.5 3% 21.5 Pts	64-Core 21.6 1% 21.6 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FDE6) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.2 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 0.6 1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
C2S3T/120G 120GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: H201202b SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 191 190 234 216 252 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.5% Below average	Read 244 Write 245 Mixed 213 SusWrite 215 52% 229 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 11.7 33% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 73.2 DQ Write 63.7 DQ Mixed 58 46% 65 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$7 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 11GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 6.7 7.6 7.4 8.3 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	5.2% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 9.5 Mixed 9 SusWrite 8.1 14% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.7 31% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 5.2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Kingston TSB1600D3S11ELD/4G 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.26% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 3.6 8% 2.9 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 1.6 4% 1.5 GB/s	Latency 295 14% 295 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.26% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C855D Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C855D

CPU
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	24x
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples	10x
A6-4400M APUAMDBench 35%, 6,363 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	22x
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	10x
Radeon HD 7520GAMDBench 2%, 4,996 samples	5x

SSD
S600 120GBHPBench 54%, 1,850 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 60GBSpccBench 52%, 2,308 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 471 samples	3x
TSB1600D3S11ELD/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 304 samples	2x
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 4GBElpidaBench 26%, 10 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16