Supermicro H8DCL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSupermicro H8DCL  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H8DCL
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '17 at 07:55
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 4180
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 86
1-Core 38
2-Core 76.2
46% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 306
27% 230 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 202
Write 122
Mixed 151
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 10.9
62% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 72
DQ Mixed 11.3
19% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
318GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 101
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.24
83% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TS512MLK72V3N 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback