Biostar Hi-Fi A85S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi A85S  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '22 at 03:56
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 46
2-Core 84.3
44% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 63.5
8-Core 145
12% 104 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Dell(1028 1265) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 49.5
46% 53.9 fps
MRender 43.1
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 45.4
38% 46.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 2.5" 120GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0324A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 250
Write 166
Mixed 45.5
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 1.1
35% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 61.3
DQ Mixed 0.3
12% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 78%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
155GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 67 68 52 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 63
Write 72.6
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 63.6
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GX64V160K SAM 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21.5% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi A85S Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi A85S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback