Casper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER LGAA 001
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateApr 27 '22 at 23:39
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 181
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 372
42% 328 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Quanta(152D 1209) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.46% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 6.6
5% 9.6 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 9.5
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.46%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,379
Write 720
Mixed 483
188% 861 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 56.5
182% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 689
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 549
412% 555 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 234%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
233GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 421 418 387 429 439 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 392
Write 277
Mixed 295
SusWrite 410
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 38.6
113% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 122
149% 263 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5704-001.A00G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 18.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback