Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive445% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '22 at 19:50
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 173
2-Core 315
107% 195 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 975
95% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,258
78% 1,258 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1605 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Lighting 88
Reflection 98.5
Parallax 86.8
72% 91.1 fps
MRender 85
Gravity 86.1
Splatting 77
67% 82.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
743GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3146 1947 1941 1945 1969 1975 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
445% Outstanding
Read 2,797
Write 2,954
Mixed 2,963
SusWrite 2,154
613% 2,717 MB/s
4K Read 87.1
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 128
422% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 1,701
DQ Write 1,437
DQ Mixed 1,567
1,174% 1,568 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 445%
Great: 488%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
327GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 479 473 162 278 233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 85.7
Mixed 405
SusWrite 351
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 57.8
199% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 115%
Great: 128%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
617GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 109 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 100
Write 104
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 109
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 36.7
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 43.4
SC Mixed 33.1
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 6,902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback