Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive440% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '22 at 18:00
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 174
2-Core 305
105% 191 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 987
95% 783 Pts
64-Core 1,252
78% 1,252 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1605 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Lighting 88.1
Reflection 98.8
Parallax 86.6
72% 91.2 fps
MRender 84.8
Gravity 86
Splatting 76.9
67% 82.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
745GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2972 1969 1954 1923 1881 2017 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
440% Outstanding
Read 2,701
Write 3,250
Mixed 2,200
SusWrite 2,119
579% 2,568 MB/s
4K Read 88
4K Write 243
4K Mixed 128
426% 153 MB/s
DQ Read 1,710
DQ Write 1,436
DQ Mixed 1,581
1,182% 1,576 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 440%
Great: 477%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
327GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 73 74 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 378
Mixed 422
SusWrite 130
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 57.9
199% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 105%
Great: 128%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
617GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 109 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 109
68% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 36.9
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 32.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 6,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $496
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback