Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201014
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '22 at 16:50
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 70.8 1-Core 104 2-Core 218 72% 131 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 445 60% 447 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 876B) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13014.8 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Lighting 15.3 Reflection 14 Parallax 21.3 12% 16.9 fps	MRender 7 Gravity 16.9 Splatting 14 11% 12.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 475 Write 438 Mixed 312 91% 408 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 93.2 4K Mixed 48.9 171% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 299 243% 344 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 428GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 97 98 98 93 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 99 Write 99.8 Mixed 63.1 SusWrite 96.2 66% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 715GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 169 165 169 167 165 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Read 137 Write 142 Mixed 75 SusWrite 166 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 113%
TDKMedia TF090 Drive 16GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 15GB free, PID 0703 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 11 11 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	7.59% Terrible	Read 24.9 Write 8.5 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 11.2 16% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.59% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x8GB 25,310 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.8% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 15 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $69

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,470x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,008x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	954x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	737x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	657x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	718x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	286x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	294x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	230x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16