Acer Aspire XC-215

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-215  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-215
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '22 at 13:06
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-6110 APU R2 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Memory 40.9
1-Core 19.7
2-Core 42.3
23% 34.3 Pts
4-Core 84.9
8-Core 83.8
11% 84.4 Pts
64-Core 71
4% 71 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 64 39 30 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 56.4
Write 76.4
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 35.2
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 84%
VendorCo ProductCode 2GB
2GB free, PID 3800
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 3.2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 3.1
6% 5.88 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LFU1KBG/2G Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-215 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-215

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback