HP 550-122nl

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 550-122nl  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime5 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 14:32
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 599
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 605
37% 605 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 292A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 8.2
6% 6.8 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 301 305 298 307 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 456
Write 305
Mixed 291
SusWrite 303
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 33.4
113% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 235
201% 295 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
73GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 175 136 128 174 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 118
Write 65.3
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 144
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 1TB
7GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 79 71 81 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 82.9
Write 83.5
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 73
98% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 43%
KIOXIA TransMemory 32GB
7GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 110
Write 14.1
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 13.1
33% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
41% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 32%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 64GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 9.6 12 10 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 94.2
Write 32
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 10.6
36% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698651-154-MCN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 11.2
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-122nl Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-122nl

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback