Fujitsu FMVA05004

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 17 months ago.
SystemFujitsu FMVA05004  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB26E
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131018
Uptime35.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '22 at 07:22
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 31.4
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 127
40% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 84.1
20% 131 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17AB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HXY120GB 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0327A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 29 27 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 335
Write 251
Mixed 24
SusWrite 53.5
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 11.5
40% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 4.3
22% 55.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF25664HZ-1G4K1 Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 4.7
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 247
16% 247 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FMVA05004 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVA05004

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback