Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 19:13
Run Duration1069 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 194
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 314
43% 318 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Asus(1043 845D) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.47% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.5
2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.47%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 1TB
843GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 37 36 31 31 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 219
Write 205
Mixed 189
SusWrite 50.8
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 23.2
84% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 65.2
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 35.3
52% 94.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 209%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
171GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 435 386 287 291 295 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 433
Mixed 422
SusWrite 356
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 46.4
150% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 362
273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 128%
HGST HUS 724030ALA640 3TB
2TB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 26 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 22.4
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 27.1
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-023.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback