Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 21:20
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 125
59% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 412
40% 328 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 8664) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1592 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 68
54% 70.3 fps
MRender 74.8
Gravity 68
Splatting 62.6
55% 68.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.0.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 21 32 31 33 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 411
Write 27.2
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 37.2
28% 132 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 25.5
99% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 9.7
20% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
890GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 31.1
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 24.3
24% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 66%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
841GB free, PID 61f5
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 240 249 249 247 248 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 292
Write 256
Mixed 267
SusWrite 228
350% 261 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 21.3
1,597% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 33.2
DQ Mixed 26.4
2,108% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 169%
Great: 411%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1866 CL10 Series ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1866 CL10 Series 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback