Illegear ARTE 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIllegear ARTE 14  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 05:41
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 154
2-Core 304
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 681
73% 579 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 114B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1215
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.9% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 47.8
45% 59.2 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 51.5
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 235 171 171 166 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 890
Write 402
Mixed 444
SusWrite 181
106% 479 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 49
221% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 317
270% 397 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 132%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16G3200CL22 Samsung 16G3200CL22 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 29
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 20.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ARTE 14 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Illegear ARTE 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback