Asus G73Jw

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus G73Jw (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G73Jw
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101108
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '22 at 04:20
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 111 59% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 228 25% 197 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 2042) 1.5GB CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.62% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 7.1 6% 8.5 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 8.7 Splatting 8 7% 9.27 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.62% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple TS128E 121GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: TQAABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 178 181 175 174 176 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43% Average	Read 163 Write 158 Mixed 162 SusWrite 175 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 25.3 76% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 29.4 DQ Write 46.6 DQ Mixed 34.2 27% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 93%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49 47,332 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 466GB free Firmware: 0003SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 96 99 99 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 90.6 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 97.8 59% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 58%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49 47,332 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 466GB free Firmware: 0003SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 97 97 98 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 84.2 Write 88 Mixed 46.7 SusWrite 96.9 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GB 455 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 11.4 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G73Jw Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jw

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	88x
Core i7 Q 840Intel $85Bench 56%, 1,339 samples	3x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	96x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4x2GBUnknownBench 42%, 289 samples	20x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 41%, 455 samples	19x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3x2GBHynixBench 35%, 234 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $228

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16