Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGigabyte AB350M-DS3H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 20:00
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 86.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 224
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 662
68% 547 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.7% Below average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 56
Parallax 65
40% 56.6 fps
MRender 56.1
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 41.5
40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EX282314RUS 120GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 359 244 310 353 185 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
158% Outstanding
Read 1,652
Write 36.8
Mixed 427
SusWrite 266
128% 595 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 38.7
192% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 214
219% 348 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 158%
Great: 147%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
69GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 99 152 133 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 152
Write 146
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 114
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
32GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 9.7 10 9 11 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 101
Write 10.7
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 10.9
32% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
54% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 36
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 30.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 110%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback