QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory23.4 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 19:49
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-10855M
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.2% Very poor
Memory 20.2
1-Core 23
2-Core 43.2
17% 28.8 Pts
4-Core 76.6
8-Core 131
13% 104 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Legend(17AA 22B8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 24.1
17% 21.5 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 25.6
23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 75%
This bench: 19%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 419GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 240 248 236 234 237 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.9% Average
Read 601
Write 302
Mixed 456
SusWrite 237
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 8
31% 8.87 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 28GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 12288 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 18.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 3.2
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 319
12% 319 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback