Intel S3210SH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel S3210SH  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080428
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 14:33
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3220-$99
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 51.2
1-Core 30.7
2-Core 57.8
31% 46.6 Pts
4-Core 86.4
8-Core 100
12% 93.2 Pts
64-Core 90.6
6% 90.6 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.00
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 0.4
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3700100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 107 61 79 106 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.9% Average
Read 159
Write 216
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 79.5
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 11.7
78% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 104
94% 143 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
581GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 82 34 50 75 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 74.7
Write 83.3
Mixed 65
SusWrite 65.5
54% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 68%
WDC WD25 00BEVS-22VAT0 250GB
45GB free, PID 0214
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 20 8 12 17 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 23.7
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 15.1
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.3
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S3210SH Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S3210SH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback