ASUS MacPro7,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemASUS MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 13:52
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$234
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 157
2-Core 316
99% 185 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 1,007
92% 774 Pts
64-Core 1,538
95% 1,538 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 237
Reflection 249
Parallax 459
193% 315 fps
MRender 378
Gravity 210
Splatting 286
236% 291 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 187%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1516 820 731 637 605 562 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,377
Write 1,705
Mixed 1,287
SusWrite 812
292% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 73
267% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1446
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 1,280
957% 1,280 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 244%
Great: 276%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
334GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1560 830 829 831 843 814 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,565
Write 1,888
Mixed 1,400
SusWrite 951
327% 1,451 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 82
299% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,561
DQ Write 1,178
DQ Mixed 1341
1,010% 1,360 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 274%
Great: 276%
Seagate ST9320320AS 320GB-$60
12GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 41.1
Write 38.3
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 32.3
25% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 37%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
879GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 117 122 120 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 104
Write 91.6
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 121
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.4
141% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 106%
LaCie P9227 Slim 2TB
4GB free, PID 1090
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 24.7
Write 30
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 27.3
37% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
185% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 57%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
72GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 64 65 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 79.4
Write 65
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 65
83% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 24.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: ASUS MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback