Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190830
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 190
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 362
49% 363 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.8% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 107
Parallax 99.1
84% 103 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 101
Splatting 97.4
80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 318 356 230 220 243 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 412
Write 470
Mixed 381
SusWrite 283
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 35.8
124% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 324
246% 330 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 99%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 207 207 210 205 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 209
Write 184
Mixed 113
SusWrite 202
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.1
24% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 27%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
410GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 166 169 170 168 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 152
Mixed 94.6
SusWrite 166
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
570GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 146 147 147 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 145
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback