Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190830
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 03:14
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 191
65% 117 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 336
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.4% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 106
Parallax 95.4
82% 100 fps
MRender 89.9
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 95.4
78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 413 365 254 253 255 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 427
Write 466
Mixed 379
SusWrite 306
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 35.2
123% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 324
246% 331 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 99%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 207 210 209 211 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 224
Write 207
Mixed 113
SusWrite 204
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.1
24% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 28%
Great: 27%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
410GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 168 169 170 169 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 152
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 167
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
571GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 138 140 137 136 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 140
Write 126
Mixed 92.4
SusWrite 136
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback