Gigabyte GA-880G-UD3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-880G-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 15:38
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 91.8
43% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 264
26% 215 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
PwrHis(1787 2360) 2GB
CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 26.3
16% 23.7 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 23.4
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 12 120 11 40 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.9% Poor
Read 155
Write 129
Mixed 120
SusWrite 44.9
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 12.1
48% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 35.5
DQ Mixed 18.6
17% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$27
307GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 113 116 115 116 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67% Good
Read 121
Write 133
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 112
72% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-880G-UD3H Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880G-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback