MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 13:03
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 72
1-Core 114
2-Core 229
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 765
74% 610 Pts
64-Core 1,130
70% 1,130 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 849E) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 66.2
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 88.8
54% 76 fps
MRender 82.1
Gravity 79.1
Splatting 61
59% 74.1 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0328D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 908 510 242 260 260 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,304
Write 859
Mixed 150
SusWrite 511
207% 956 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 73.1
237% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 479
445% 688 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 233%
Great: 271%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$254
4.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 191 194 192 197 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 200
Mixed 100
SusWrite 196
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.3
296% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 175 175 172 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 172
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 174
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 100%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$201
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 140 139 140 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 138
Write 132
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 140
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
227% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80%
Great: 97%
WD2002 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 20.05B.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 99 99 95 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.8% Above average
Read 79
Write 71
Mixed 71
SusWrite 97.6
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 54%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB
390GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 104 104 102 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 101
Write 93.5
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 104
120% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMWX16GC3600C18W2D 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.2% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $686
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback