Performance Results


Gaming 126% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA560
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '22 at 08:23
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 85.3 1-Core 130 2-Core 251 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 681 71% 570 Pts	64-Core 685 42% 685 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 214 Reflection 198 Parallax 208 175% 207 fps	MRender 214 Gravity 152 Splatting 124 129% 164 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 170%
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2012) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.06% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 9.6 Parallax 8.6 5% 8.13 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 11.5 8% 9.57 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.06% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D512 512GB 2,452 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQ20904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 322 326 290 247 271 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 1,297 Write 226 Mixed 497 SusWrite 300 126% 580 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 90.5 4K Mixed 46 163% 57.8 MB/s	DQ Read 948 DQ Write 443 DQ Mixed 409 380% 600 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 234%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 1TB free Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1330 1490 1586 1624 1528 1691 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	288% Outstanding	Read 2,038 Write 1,966 Mixed 1,831 SusWrite 1,542 415% 1844 MB/s	4K Read 57.6 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 72.5 237% 79.4 MB/s	DQ Read 999 DQ Write 727 DQ Mixed 849 638% 858 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 526%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.4% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 22.5 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 15.9 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	731x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	270x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	245x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	207x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	271x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	183x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	409x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	160x
TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x16GBUnknownBench 76%, 2,477 samples	13x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16