Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core 67 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 43.5 2-Core 87.2 38% 62.2 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 171 22% 166 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PwrHis(1787 2335) 2GB CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.1 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 0.3 Reflection 11 0% 5.65 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Elsa 240 240GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN5267 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 28 14 28 18 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.8% Poor	Read 166 Write 43.7 Mixed 78.9 SusWrite 23 17% 78 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 13.6 4K Mixed 12.2 37% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 60.8 DQ Write 29.3 DQ Mixed 34.3 28% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 27%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 24GB free Firmware: 1AA01114 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 83 84 84 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 71.7 Write 86.2 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 83.7 55% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8.6 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

SSD
MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH12ABHA 256GBCrucialBench 83%, 1,792 samples	2x
SSDPR-CL100-240-G2 240GBBench 68%, 1,204 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5173BH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 56 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 41%, 1,116 samples	2x
99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,159 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16